Child care center ·
1121 E PLEASANT RUN RD, Desoto, TX 75115-4201 ·
License 1750416
Capacity 110. ToddlerPre-KindergartenSchool
Accepts subsidy
| Severity | Date | Standard / narrative | Corrected |
|---|
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5605(3) - Safety Precautions for Loading and Unloading Children - Account for All Children
As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that the van driver failed to adequately check the vehicle used by children. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.5625(b) - Electronic Child Safety Alarm - installed and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions
The alarm installed in the van used for transporatation was not in working order. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was able to exit the operation unsupervised. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(4) - AP Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Ensure No Child Abused, Neglected, or Exploited
The standard was evaluated as related to a DFPS investigation. As a result of the DFPS investigation it was determined that a child in care was neglected when he was left inside a vehicle unattended for a period of time. Based on all information found in the DFPS investigation the operation is cited for Neglectful Supervision. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.305(a)(6) - Report Situation Placing Children at Risk
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The operation failed to report a child was left on the van to HHSC Child Care Regulation. |
— |
| 4 | — |
746.1601 - Child/ Caregiver Ratio - 13 or More Children
One caregiver was observed caring for 35 children ages 3-4 during naptime. The specified age group for the room was 3 years old. The room was out of ratio by 5. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The operation lacked proper supervision, allowing a child to be outside alone for an unknown period. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1201(1) - Responsibilities of Employees and Caregivers -Demonstrate Competency, Good Judgment, Self-control
The staff failed to use good judgement by providing false information to the mother about the children?s release, contacting the father based on prior pick-up interactions with the mother and allowing the children to be taken over the back fence for release. |
— |
| 5 | — |
746.1205(a)(4) - Supervision ensures each child?s safety, well-being, including physical proximity and auditory or visual awareness of each child?s on going activity
The standard was evaluated as related a DFPS investigation. The DFPS investigation revealed that a child was left unsupervised on the van. |
— |
48 inspection record(s) on file from TX-HHSC.
Licensed facilities near this one, highest compliance score first.